![]() ![]() Most of the time, users will be in the Develop persona for working with RAW images or the Photo persona for general editing, drawing, and painting. This makes it possible to keep the interface as minimal as possible while still providing all the tools necessary for a full range of editing tasks. All photos used in the screenshots are mine! User InterfaceĪffinity Photo is broken down into five modules that Serif calls ‘personas,’ which are accessed in the top left and focused on particular tasks: Photo, Liquify, Develop, Tone Mapping, and Export. Note: The screenshots in the following review were taken with the Windows version of the software, but the Mac version should be almost the same, with only a few slight interface variations. To get a complete rundown of the features offered in Affinity Photo, you can view the full feature list here. We’ll look at the overall interface design, as well as how Affinity handles RAW adjustments, general pixel-based editing, drawing and painting, and HDR imagery. The Detailed Review of Affinity PhotoĪffinity Photo is a large and complex program with a wide range of features, and we don’t have room to look at them all in this review. I’m always on the lookout for an up-and-coming program that can help improve my workflow, so I treat all my image editor reviews as though I might consider using the program myself.ĭisclaimer: Serif has given me no compensation or consideration for the writing of this review, and they have had no editorial input or control over the final results. My experience ranges from small open-source editors to industry-standard software suites, and that has given me a unique perspective on what a good editor can accomplish – as well as how frustrating a poorly-designed one can be.ĭuring my training as a graphic designer, we spent a fair amount of time both using these software packages and understanding the logic that went into the design of their user interfaces, and that also helps me to separate out the good programs from the bad. Hi, my name is Thomas Boldt, and I’ve worked with many different image editors in my career as a graphic designer and a professional photographer. What I Don’t Like: Lacking photo library management. Best of all, Affinity is available as a one-time purchase, no subscription required. The upgrade from version 1.0 to version 2.0 fixed most of the issues that I experienced in my earlier testing and added a bunch of great new tools. Drawing and painting tools are responsive and quite excellent, as are the vector drawing tools, which are also compatible with Affinity Designer.Īffinity Photo is still fairly new in terms of development, but the team behind it is constantly working on new features and bug fixes. ![]() It has a well-designed, customizable interface and performs most editing tasks rapidly, although it may take some time to adapt to the ‘personas’ concept that divides the app into sections. Sure, it takes a few seconds to apply filters, but the user interface and particularly the brushes respond instantly to inputs.Affinity Photo is a powerful and affordable image editor that is directly competing with Photoshop for enthusiasts and professional users. Even though an older device such as the Wacom Mobile Studio Pro 13 equipped with an Intel Core i7-6567U (two Skylake cores) trailed far behind newer systems with a score of 97, Affinity Photo 2 remained usable even when processing larger images. Both chips performed around 43 and 50 per cent better than the Core i7-12700H and Apple M2 respectively. Unsurprisingly, the Apple M1 Pro and M1 Max delivered around the same level of performance because they practically share the same CPU configuration. The Intel Core i7-12700H (14 cores) performed 13 per cent better than the Core i9-11900K (8 cores) – this is roughly the same margin you would expect to see in Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5. ![]() In any case, Affinity Photo 2 benefits from higher CPU core counts. That is to say, the results do not reflect any possible performance limitations caused by inadequate cooling under sustained load. Even the power-efficient Apple M1 in the iPad Pro managed to slightly outperform the desktop processor Intel Core i9-11900K, despite the fact that the Intel CPU is ahead of the M1 in benchmarks such as Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5 in terms of both single- and multi-core performance.Īt this point, we need to emphasise that each run of the benchmark in Affinity Photo 2 only lasts a few seconds. ![]() When it comes to processor performance, Affinity Photo 2 demonstrates a similarly high level of optimisation for Apple's platform. CPU benchmarks: Apple M1 beats Intel Core i9-11900K ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |